The thing about being the most successful business in an industry is that you’re constantly criticized. Onlookers observe any number of things that your competitors do differently, and they lament your unwillingness to follow suit. What’s weird about this behavior is that nobody becomes the leader in a large industry by accident. To the contrary, corporations claw their way up through grit, determination, and quality leadership.
In the theme park oligopoly, critics get something extremely wrong. They frequently assail Disney for not mimicking less successful competitors. My goal here is to flip that assumption on its head. After all, Disney’s better, and they’ve got the park traffic and revenue to prove it. The more interesting discussion to me is what Universal Studios, Disney’s most ballyhooed competitor, should do better.
I see the difference between the two organizations as significant and feel like Universal is falling behind rather than catching up. Here are several things Universal should learn from Disney.
Theming
Happiest Place on Earth, he had a single purpose. He wanted to build a family-friendly environment where parents could spend hours entertaining their children. His ace in the hole for his new development was the Disney library.
Disney-built theme parks are the gold standard in theming. I’m not saying anything provocative or controversial here. When Walt Disney constructed theUncle Walt proudly displayed his characters everywhere at the park in the earliest days. Several of the opening day attractions, ones still in operation today, highlighted Disney films. Snow White’s Scary Adventures, Peter Pan’s Flight, and Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride all denoted the filmmaker’s pride in his stories. In the 65 years that have followed, Disney has maintained excellence in the realm of theming.
The Amazing Adventures of Spider-Man featured impeccable theming, but they were the exceptions, not the rule. Ten years after the Potterverse arrived in Orlando, Universal’s attempts at theming remain mediocre at best.
For Universal, the light didn’t seem to go on until The Wizarding World of Harry Potter arrived. That was in 2009. Sure, some individual rides such as E.T. Adventure andThe main non-Potter highlight is Springfield, the fictional town from The Simpsons, and its success owes as much to the show as anything else. Universal didn’t have to do anything complicated to bring Springfield to life. They just had to build a Moe’s Tavern and Krusty Burger and Kwik-E-Mart. Matt Groening’s team had done all the homework for Universal Studios.
Beyond that, I mean, we have a Minions ride and a Transformers ride and a Jimmy Fallon ride (for some reason). What is the underlying theming, though? Universal fails so completely in this field that they once built a Shrek attraction that somehow ended up seeming like a cheap knock-off of Mickey’s PhilharMagic. I don’t even know how that’s possible, an ogre imitating a mouse. But it perfectly embodies Universal’s continued weakness with theming. They have high-quality intellectual properties. They just don’t seem to know what to do with them.
Ride variance
This is the gimme of the conversation. Quick, close your eyes and think about the various attractions at Universal Studios. What jumped in your head? Was it the motion simulator, The Simpsons Ride? Or was it the motion simulator, Transformers: The Ride 3D. Since I just mentioned The Amazing Adventures of Spider-Man, you may have thought of that particular…motion simulator.
Look, ride design at Universal Studios is an easy target. Park operators know that motion simulators check a lot of boxes. They require little space for their ride buildings, they are reasonably easy to maintain, and they’re cheap to construct. For example, The Simpsons Ride cost only $30 million.
Generally speaking, Universal Studios hasn’t pushed the boundaries of theme park technology in recent years, because they haven’t had to do so. They’re perfectly comfortable building these cost-controlled, lowest common denominator attractions. In other words, they’re fine with being safe.
Pandora – The World of Avatar and Star Wars: Galaxy’s Edge on its recent resume. At Universal, they have built what feels like seventeen different versions of Star Tours. Even the primary Harry Potter attractions fall into this category, at least somewhat. Imagine if Disney settled like that.
Contrast this style with Disney, which hasInstead, Imagineers would rather explore the laws of physics with Slinky Dog Dash, bring the fictional realm of Arendelle to life with Frozen Ever After, and augment reality with Avatar Flight of Passage. And that Pandora ride, even as a motion simulator of sorts, somehow elevates the genre in thrilling new ways. Disney pushes boundaries. Universal needs to stop running to the middle and show some courage when designing attractions.
The food
One of my favorite things to mention about Walt Disney World is that it’s home to one of the top two fine-dining restaurants in the United States. This fact blows the minds of non-Disney people. When friends ask me for trip suggestions for Disney vacations, I always lead with the dining. I want everyone to understand the stunning quality of the food at Walt Disney World.
We tend to take this for granted, as theme park tourists are used to the deep roster of great eateries on the Disney campus. My family can easily plan a seven-night vacation’s worth of meals. In truth, we generally have to skip a few of our favorites due to lack of availability or, you know, fear of gluttony.
At Universal Studios, we tend to eat at both Harry Potter restaurants. Honestly, we do it more out of obligation than any real excitement for the cuisine, though. Somehow, Rose & Crown Dining Room serves better British food than the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, something I find inexcusable.
To a larger point, the best in-park restaurant at Universal is unquestionably Mythos. Deciding the second-best eatery borders on irrelevant. If you don’t like Mythos, your best bet is to head outside to Universal CityWalk Orlando. And most of the restaurants there are chain establishments rather than unique offerings. So, Disney Springs has it all over CityWalk, too.
Universal simply hasn’t prioritized dining enough at its parks. The entire campus is a gigantic cliché about fatty carnival food. Disney hires Top Chef winners and Michelin Star chefs. Universal serves Krusty Burgers that even Krusty would worry are too disgusting for customers to eat.
Customer satisfaction
The final suggestion is more of a meta-statement. Customers just like Disney better. The company is frequently listed as one of the five most admired businesses in America. The same is most assuredly not true of NBCUniversal. Before you protest, please remember that the actual owner of this subdivision is…Comcast. Yeah.
Sure, Universal Studios gets caught in the bad press of Comcast, but the park experience still isn’t good enough. Surveys for Disney are generally glowing, with the company acting to remove attractions that aren’t up to snuff like Stitch’s Great Escape. At Universal, what’s there is there and seems like it will be there until the end of time. I’m looking at you, innumerable water rides and Dr. Seuss attractions!
For some reason, Universal seems to lack the passion for theme park management that Disney possesses. With Universal, they seem to do the bare minimum to earn return visits from guests. To my mind, they could learn from Disney in two specific meta-areas.
The first is customer service. Have you ever had an issue at Walt Disney World? A cast member will treat you like the most important person on the planet, doing everything that they can to solve your problem. At Universal, just finding an employee can feel like an adventure. Getting a helpful one is a lottery ticket, with roughly the same odds of winning as the real lottery.
Look, Universal can’t possibly match the customer service at Disney theme parks. The latter company has literally written the book on customer service excellence. I’d just like to see Universal act like they want to be competitive. Many of the workers here act like they didn’t get the job that they wanted at Disney, and so these employees are stuck where they are. It’s regrettable and seemingly systemic.
The other critical area for improvement is line queue management. Disney’s invested billions of dollars trying to get customers out of long lines. Sure, it’s an impossible dilemma due to the popularity of Disney theme parks, but they DO try.
Thus far, Universal’s best strategy is to sell a super-expensive Universal Express Pass. Disney receives a beating any time that they run an upsell ticketed event like Disney After Hours. Universal sells the same thing EVERY day. It’s a fundamental part of Universal Studios park dynamics that the higher-paying customers receive a vastly superior experience.
I’m someone who uses Universal Express whenever I visit the park. I do it because I can completely conquer two parks in two days, and I have plenty of time left over to spend extra hours in Springfield and the Wizarding World. I also do it because the lines at Universal are maddening when I don’t have the express pass. Like, they’re a deal-breaker for me. I won’t even consider a visit without that pass.
Disney’s built an app, My Disney Experience, so that guests can book FastPasses rather than wait in line. Universal’s app borders on cruel. It tells you what the wait-times are but does nothing to help you avoid them. To their credit, they did add Virtual Line at Volcano Bay, but exponentially more guests visit the theme parks than the water park. It’s noticeably absent from these locations.
When I evaluate the difference in management at Disney and Universal, the primary difference is want-to. Universal needs to care more about the park experience of its customers. That’s a choice management must make, a commitment to do better in the face of stiff competition. To date, Universal’s just rolled over and ceded dominance to Disney. The time is now to push back instead. Universal can’t rely on Harry Potter forever.