Home ยป 3 Extreme Roller Coasters That Pushed The Limits Too Far

3 Extreme Roller Coasters That Pushed The Limits Too Far

Roller coaster designers are always looking to push the boundaries to generate new levels of excitement. Sometimes, though, they can go too far…

The basic concept of a gravity-driven roller coaster has evolved substantially over the past two centuries, and coasters now come in a variety of shapes, sizes and types. Traditional wooden coasters live on, but inverted coasters, launched coasters and a myriad of other variations are now installed at theme parks all over the world.

Inevitably, though, sometimes designers and manufacturers get it wrong. Here are three innovative roller coasters that proved to be just a little too ahead of their time.

3. Revere Beach Lightning

Revere Beach Lightning

The Revere Beach Lightning was the brainchild of renowned designer Harry Traver. Opened in 1927, it was the first in a trio of similar coasters that were designed to combine sudden drops with sharp, high-speed turns. Ironically, the coasters were known as the Giant Cyclone Safety Coasters – but would prove to be anything but safe.

The unique layout was made possible by a hybrid steel structure, which enabled steeply banked curves and rapid transitions. Unfortunately, the 100-feet-tall Lightning quick became famous for all the wrong reasons. The first fatality occurred on just the second day of operation, when a girl fell from the train. Incredibly, after her body was recovered, the ride reopened just 20 minutes later.

A string of other riders suffered serious injuries on the attraction. The phrase “Take her on the Lightning” became popular among young men, as an unconventional solution to an unwanted pregnancy.

Following the Wall Street crash in 1929, maintaining the Lightning became financially unviable. Riders were saved from the agony that it caused by its enforced closure in 1933.

2. Cannon Coaster

Cannon Coaster

Image via Westland.net

New York’s Coney Island helped to establish the popularity of roller coasters and other amusement rides in the United States. It hosted a variety of unique and unusual rides – but 1902’s Cannon Coaster stands out as being the most ridiculous.

George Francis Meyer’s design included a gap in its track. The idea was that the train would leap over it, in a thrilling effect that had never been attempted before. Had the park managed to pull it off, the ride would have simulated the “car leaps canyon” seen in innumerable action movies since.

Mercifully, the “leap the gap” concept was never tested with humans. The train was run through the circuit loaded with sandbags, but several crashes resulted. In the end, the Cannon Coaster opened with the gap filled in. That didn’t stop it being popular, with urban myths of fatalities during the test phase helping to ensure its popularity.

1. Son of Beast

Son of Beast

Image: Chris Hagerman, Wikipedia

Opened as a “sequel” to Kings Islands legendary The Beast wooden coaster in 2000, Son of Beast was meant to be similarly groundbreaking. Standing at some 218-feet-tall, it was tallest and fastest wooden roller coaster in the world. The ride was also constructed with a 118-foot vertical loop in its circuit, making it the first modern wooden coaster to incorporate such an inversion.

Very quickly, Son of Beast developed a reputation for roughness. Then, disaster struck in July 2006, when the ride was closed after a part of its structure failed, leading to an incident in which several riders suffered injuries. As a result, the ride’s trains were replaced with lighter versions to reduce stress on the track, and the signature loop was removed.

Son of Beast was closed again in June 2009, when a woman claimed that it caused a blood vessel in her brain to burst. Ohio state investigators later ruled that the ride design was not at fault for the injury, but Kings Island opted to keep the ride closed while it considered options for its future. It never reopened, and has now been dismantled. Kings Island is believed to have considered overhauling it once again, but the cost of doing so and the negative public perception of the ride may have resulted in the decision to remove it for good.